ophicleidon
Level 5 Mixist
 
Melody 
26th Σ4.410

 
Walkability 
29th Σ4.263

 
Nostalgia 
30th Σ4.119

 
Musiking 
24th Σ4.352

 
Melody in Pants 
25th Σ4.128

 
pointy peek
 
  28th/39   Σ21.272   Mar 6th 2020 9:23am
 
/player/EntryPlay/33661/
33661
 
Free lossless download: https://ophicleidon.bandcamp.com/track/pointy-peek

Renoise video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43J_xE0yvH4&

my first song made in renoise (or any tracker, for that matter)! "mixed" and "mastered" in reaper.

I love how easy it is to slice samples up. I'll have a lot of fun with this setup in the future.

Hope you enjoy :)

Feedback welcome!
Creative Commons License
68
4
1
10
23
 


previous entry
HorkHolgen - Walkman Fugue


nextious entry
Notademoscener - Walkman chords
 
118518
Level 22 Mixist
post #118518 :: 2020.03.15 8:39am
im just gonna go ahead and give you all 7s cause your renoise module is 700 bpm.
 
 
118522
Level 5 Mixist
post #118522 :: 2020.03.15 10:48am
My current predictions have this track at #34 out of 39 tracks.

So if you actually did that, it's be cool to be bumped up a place or too, but I'd also lose the satisfaction of correctly predicting my track ranking.

(I know you're joking)
 
 
118523
Level 30 Chipist
post #118523 :: 2020.03.15 10:52am
im very curious how you're calculating that stuff. do you use favs/comments amount in relation to rank on previous major battles?
 
 
118524
Level 30 Chipist
post #118524 :: 2020.03.15 10:52am
am i fucking up your calculation if i write a lot of comments?
 
 
118525
Level 30 Chipist
post #118525 :: 2020.03.15 10:52am
is this what your neural network doesnt like?
 
 
118526
Level 5 Mixist
post #118526 :: 2020.03.15 11:02am
  
  kleeder liēkd this
if entry["name"] == "pointy peek": entry["comments"] -= 4.

:P

But in any case, a neural network would be super overkill and overfit, it's just a linear regression over plays, favs, downloads, number of votes, number of comments.

The factors make intuitive sene to me: faves is the biggest, and they're all positive (except for plays, which is counterintuitive and maybe I should take it out).

I estimate that the error for a given rank I predict is typically +/- 30%, but it gets the very top and the very bottom pretty much correctly and
consistently.

Of course now that I've explained how it works, someone could try to abuse it, but it's not worth the effort and I can correct for it anyway :P

By the way, in my calculations, yours comes out in the middle of the pack, so I can't predict its rank very accurately (except to say that it's in the middle of the pack)
 
 
118527
Level 30 Chipist
post #118527 :: 2020.03.15 11:09am
-= 5

ah! yeah that makes sense. we'll see how accurate it is c:
interesting would be a prediction regarding score as well - as in: who's over 20 and who's lower than badge progress
 
 
118528
Level 5 Mixist
post #118528 :: 2020.03.15 11:16am
  
  kleeder liēkd this
Relative predictions are good: I'm fairly sure the top 5 is going to
(roughly, and if people don't vote a lot at the end of the compo) be:

#1: Thomas long name
#2: Winter walk
#3: Kirby Air Walk
#4: Lazer City Aerobics
#5: Fluidman

But the absolute scores are completely messed up
 
 
118565
Level 12 Chipist
post #118565 :: 2020.03.19 8:17am
  
  ophicleidon liēkd this
 
 
118566
Level 5 Mixist
post #118566 :: 2020.03.19 12:01pm
I'm confused - which I guess is your point. :P
 
 

LOGIN or REGISTER to add your own comments!